WHAT COMPLICATIONS AND CHANGES POST- BREXIT WILL FACE - REFCCO
British product compliance and CE
marking regulations will be unfold after March 2019
It
is not a secret the United Kingdom has voted to leave the European Union in
March 2019. Brexit will have to decide on how the UK will manage
“post-Brexit” product safety. UK safety legislation has gradually developed
during the UK’s membership of the EU. It is implemented in UK law as Statutory
Instruments (SIs). Part of the conditions of membership of the EU is that
Directives are implemented into national law within the timeframe specified in
the Directive. EU Regulations have a direct effect on a law in EU member
states. The EU Directives and Regulations concerning product safety aim to
facilitate free trade within and with the EU member states by ensuring that the
same product safety requirements apply throughout the EU.
CE
marking as a compliance system began
in 1993 as a means of demonstrating that a product complies with the essential
requirements of the EU safety legislation via the relevant product standards.
Without a CE mark, no product can be legally imported into or sold within
Europe. As a result, for more than 30 years the UK has been part of a system
seen as being synonymous with the European Union or European Community.
The
main concern is what happens to the UK safety legislation after Brexit and how
burdens on manufacturers, exporters, and importers can be minimized. The
possible scenarios are the following:
1. Remain in the EU Customs Union:
EU Free Trade Directives and Regulations would continue to apply. The existing
arrangements could remain in place with little modification except for a change
in the Statutory Instruments.
2. Full Mutual Recognition:
Outside the customs union, for minimal disruption and impact on consumers,
manufacturers, importers, and exporters, there could be some kind of mutual recognition
agreement (MRA) between the EU and UK for CE marking product safety Directives
and Regulations, standards which would leave the current situation essentially
unchanged from present. The UK would continue to recognize a CE marking and the
CE marking process as a means to demonstrate that a product is safe.
3. UK unilaterally continues to
use CE Directives: The UK could unilaterally continue to accept EU CE
marking services and the process and requirements set out in EU
Directives and Regulations as an indicator of safe products. The UK would
accept certificates from EU Notified Organizations (NBs), but there would be no
reciprocal acceptance. This may not be possible outside the customs union and
it has the same political problem of putting UK product safety requirements
under EU control, but with even less possibility of influence. It does have the
advantage of providing continuity for manufacturers and users and does not
require complex negotiation with the
EU. It would only be useful if UK regulations continued to be updated to mirror
EU regulations as they develop.
4. Retain existing Statutory
Instruments but stripped of EU features: The default position under the Great
Repeal Bill appears to be that existing regulations would be adapted to remove
all references to the EU. The articles of the current CE marking SIs are based
on the assumption that implementing counties are within the EU, so they would
require substantial modification to be implemented into UK law and would need
to be recast as safety regulations, possibly under the Consumer Protection Act
or Health and Safety at Work Act, depending on their product sector. The
regulations would become internal to UK, an EU CE marking would no longer have
any legal validity in the UK, and UK Notified Organizations could no longer
perform conformity assessment for CE marking and would cease to exist.
Manufacturers would need to approach EU-based Notified Bodies for conformity
assessment for sales into EU countries.
5. Complete deregulation: An
alternative and opposite position to the previous scenario would be a complete
deregulation of UK safety regulations. The UK market would become open to
equipment that does not meet any particular standards of safety or performance.
This approach involves minimal negotiating effort for the UK government and
would be in keeping with their preference for the reduction in regulation. It
would also be the effect of a ‘cliff edge’ situation where no alternatives to
EU-based regulations are put into effect in time.
Contingent
upon the final arrangements, UK industries may be in the same situation as
those outside of the EU. Brexit effects on industries would be:
·
The
need to become familiar with UK safety regime which replaces CE marking
·
The
necessity to follow on the developments in EU standards and regulations as well
as UK regulations
·
Various
product features and documentation for EU and UK market
·
The
need to quote an EU address on CE Declarations of conformity
In
order to build a workable post-Brexit system, the government requires substantial
resources to review and update existing legislation.
Comments
Post a Comment